The evidence record.
37 items an external reviewer would ask for, each recorded in one of four states. This page publishes the register as it stands, including the parts of it that are empty.
What each item is.
An evidence register that recorded only what exists would be a list of strengths. This one records the absences in the same table, in the same terms.
14 items
Written, in the College’s possession, and producible on request. The programme specifications, the curriculum maps, the assessment regulations, the governance register itself.
14 items
Not written. For five of them the decision has now been taken — the Executive adopted all twenty-five outstanding decisions on 14 August 2026 — and what is missing is the regulation somebody must draft from it. For the rest, including the College’s own constitution, no document exists and no body with the standing to approve one has been constituted.
7 items
Nothing collects the data at all. Live-session attendance, student feedback and academic misconduct are the clearest cases. Recorded as not instrumented rather than as zero, because “no cases recorded” and “no cases occurred” are different statements and only the first is true.
2 items
Cannot exist yet by their own nature — an annual monitoring report before a first year, a graduate outcomes record before a first graduate. Dated rather than pretended.
0 of 37 items have been approved.
Approval is not a formality — it is a named person accepting responsibility for a document. Both of the College’s academic bodies stand at zero appointed members, so there is nobody who can approve anything. Every item in the register therefore carries an owner and a review interval and an empty approval field, and will keep carrying one until appointments are made. An institution that quietly self-approved its own evidence would have a full register and no assurance at all.
What the register covers.
| Collection | Items | State |
|---|---|---|
| Academic Integrity | 1 | Drafted, awaiting an approver |
| Academic Regulations | 3 | Exists (1), Drafted, awaiting an approver (2) |
| Annual Monitoring | 1 | Not yet possible |
| Appeals | 1 | Drafted, awaiting an approver |
| Assessment Moderation | 1 | Nothing collects it |
| Assessment Regulations | 4 | Exists (1), Drafted, awaiting an approver (3) |
| Competency Framework | 1 | Exists |
| Continuous Improvement Register | 1 | Exists |
| Curriculum Maps | 2 | Exists (1), Drafted, awaiting an approver (1) |
| Executive Decisions | 1 | Exists |
| External Review Reports | 1 | Nothing collects it |
| Faculty Qualifications | 1 | Nothing collects it |
| Governance | 4 | Exists (1), Drafted, awaiting an approver (3) |
| Graduate Outcomes | 1 | Nothing collects it |
| Institutional Self-Evaluation | 1 | Exists |
| Internal Review Reports | 1 | Exists |
| Learning Outcomes | 1 | Nothing collects it |
| Policy Register | 2 | Drafted, awaiting an approver (1), Not yet possible (1) |
| Programme Specifications | 3 | Exists |
| Quality Assurance | 3 | Exists (2), Drafted, awaiting an approver (1) |
| Risk Registers | 1 | Drafted, awaiting an approver |
| Staff Development | 1 | Nothing collects it |
| Student Feedback | 1 | Nothing collects it |
6 items are public rather than internal.
Most of a quality register is properly internal. These are not, because a reader is entitled to check them without asking anyone’s permission.
| Reference | Item |
|---|---|
| AREG-001 | Academic Framework |
| CF-001 | The six competencies |
| CM-001 | Level I–VI curriculum documents |
| POL-002 | Accessibility policy |
| PS-001 | IEFC programme specification |
| PS-003 | Academic calendar |
Any internal item can be requested by a reviewer, a panel or a prospective institutional partner from info@worldwencollege.co.uk.